- 404.981.6071
- drbarnes@blueprintpsy.com
- 15800 Birmingham Hwy, Milton, GA 30004 Suite 600
Blueprint Psychology provides forensic-related psychological and neuropsychological evaluations for children, adolescents, and adults. These evaluations address legally relevant referral questions through objective, evidence-based assessment of cognitive functioning, emotional and behavioral status, executive functioning, and adaptive abilities.
Each evaluation is conducted with careful attention to professional standards, ethical guidelines, and the specific legal question at hand. Evaluations are structured to provide clear, defensible documentation, integrating clinical interviews, standardized assessment, records review, and collateral information as appropriate. The role of the evaluator is not advocacy for any party, but to offer objective findings and well-supported conclusions to assist attorneys, courts, and agencies in informed decision-making.
Forensic evaluations are commonly requested in matters involving diagnostic clarification, cognitive and executive functioning, psychological status, personality functioning, trauma-related concerns, capacity and competency questions, substance abuse, parental fitness considerations, and independent or second-opinion evaluations, particularly when clarity is required within a legal or high-stakes context.
A forensic psychological or neuropsychological evaluation is an objective assessment conducted to address legally relevant questions. These evaluations focus on cognitive, psychological, and functional functioning as it relates to a specific legal referral question.
Forensic evaluations are conducted for legal purposes and prioritize objectivity, neutrality, and adherence to legal and ethical standards. Unlike clinical evaluations, forensic assessments are not treatment-focused and are not conducted within a therapeutic relationship.
Forensic evaluations are commonly requested by attorneys, courts, agencies, or other legal professionals. In some cases, evaluations may be court-ordered or requested by involved parties for legal clarification.
Depending on the referral question, forensic evaluations may address cognitive functioning, psychological status, decision-making capacity, effects of injury or illness, symptom presentation, and other legally relevant functional concerns.
No. The evaluator’s role is to remain neutral and objective. Findings are based solely on assessment data, professional standards, and the specific referral question, without advocacy for any party.
Evaluations typically include a review of relevant records, a clinical interview, standardized psychological and neuropsychological testing, and assessment of response validity. The scope is tailored to the legal referral question.
Yes. A comprehensive written report is prepared that outlines methods, findings, and conclusions relevant to the referral question. Reports are written to be clear, structured, and defensible within legal contexts.
Reports are provided to the referring attorney, court, or authorized party as outlined in the referral agreement or court order. Confidentiality and disclosure are governed by legal and ethical requirements.
In some cases, evaluators may provide testimony related to their findings. Availability for testimony and related arrangements are discussed separately and are subject to professional and legal guidelines.
The length of a forensic evaluation varies depending on the complexity of the referral question, records review, and testing needs. Timing is discussed during the referral and intake process.
Confidentiality in forensic evaluations differs from clinical settings. Information obtained during the evaluation may be disclosed to the court or referring legal parties as required by the nature of the evaluation.
Attorneys or authorized parties may contact the office directly to discuss referral questions, scope of evaluation, timelines, and procedural requirements.
No. Forensic evaluations are not treatment-based and do not establish a therapeutic relationship. Recommendations, when included, are limited to addressing the legal referral question and may suggest further evaluation or consultation rather than ongoing treatment.
